top of page

Gladiator II

Nov 18, 2024
2 min read

Updated: Aug 6

There’s no limit to how much time can pass, no limit to the standalone nature of an original film and no limit to the success, both critically and commercially, in terms of whether something will get a legacy sequel.


Indeed, some of the more successful have been from those deemed most unlikely: Top Gun, Trainspotting, Mad Max and Blade Runner to name some of the frontrunners of the trend.


It’s a nailing of the ‘tone’ that is key, modernising something whilst still retaining the ‘feel’ of the original. Gladiator II is excellent in this regard.


The original is one of the best films of the noughties because it feels like it set a lot of the precedent for that time and its standing as a serious, almost old-fashioned historical epic was wildly influential.


Its sequel is dropping into a vastly different cinematic landscape but its adherence to this tone and all its trappings is to its benefit and, whilst it won’t have the same influence as the first, it feels suitably epic, audience-pleasing and grand.


It is rather a copy/paste job like Star Wars: The Force Awakens before it but, like that film, by recycling the plot, adding some references and touches of the first and revelling in its setting and battles it presents as proper, old-skool blockbuster.


The set piece scenes are truly epic and brutal, the recreation of ancient Rome is, again, mesmerising and its fairly rapid plot cycles (there’s clearly a longer cut out there somewhere) means you’re propelled through the two-and-a-half-hour runtime.


The slight plot skips and the lack of colouring in the details prevents this from scaling the highest of heights but Paul Mescal offers enough to grab onto the main character in a very good Russell Crowe approximation (making the character personable, despite a relative lack of personality offered in the script).


We get a few different types of supporting character with the MVP being Denzel Washington’s gladiator owner Macrinus who chews scenery for fun and elevates the film closer to what the supposed, Nick Cave-written ‘Maximus in the afterlife’ tale could maybe have been.


The film we've actually got is still worthy of celebration though.


It doesn’t quite match up to its forebear but is a very worthy successor, playing the right notes, stirring the same emotions and revelling in the same sandbox.


We are entertained.


⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Social Reckoning

I guess there’s a degree of irony in posting a positive review of The Social Reckoning onto social media and praising its pointed messaging. The ‘investigative journalism thriller’ is always a winner

 
 
 
Digger

Alejandro González Iñárritu is certainly not afraid of a big swing. Whilst it’s fair to say that Digger doesn’t get close to the heights of Birdman or The Revenant, its critical panning feels unusual,

 
 
 
Hope (2026)

You won’t have seen a film with as many contrasts as Na Hong-jin’s Hope. At once impeccably crafted and beautiful, but also batshit crazy and prone to toilet humour interludes. At times you can feel w

 
 
 

Comments


 

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

 

© Copyright 2015 by Daniel Oldfield. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page