top of page

One Night Only

Aug 25
2 min read

Original doesn’t always mean good and, to further go against most every review I’ve ever written, not all ‘Black Mirror-esque’ ideas necessarily make for great films.


One Night Only is, however, an interesting one and might be fairly divisive.


So, against what you may see from the trailers and posters, this is a romantic comedy film but set very much in some sort of quasi-future, dystopian version of America where The Purge is real except, instead of crime being legal for one night, pre-marital sex is legal for one night and banned otherwise.


This much is revealed in an opening title card and, initially, it’s an absolutely bizarre, faintly ridiculous idea that spoils most of the beginning of the film as you in the audience go through all of the scenarios and potential plot holes that situation would inevitable throw up in your head.


Then, somehow, it kind of explains how this all works in some exposition delivered through news reels and smartly introduces some background elements clearly suggesting most people are against the idea.


However, the rest of the film largely just plays like a standard, fluffy rom-com where everyone has just accepted that this is the norm.


There’s two schools of thought here.


Being extremely negative, this almost scans as some sort of autocratic, government-mandated film preparing people for the eventual reality of this premise.


There’s a vague haze of ‘this film has been approved’ to the whole thing, almost sent from the future. There’s no religious mention that I caught but it almost feels as if there’s that sort of messaging in here too.


On the other hand, this is a super breezy, largely fun and traditional rom-com that zigzags appropriately, contains a nutty premise that you eventually accept and is helpfully anchored by two excellent lead performances from Monica Barbaro and Callum Turner.


There’s some great and unexpected cameos, solid direction and the (literal) climax is earned.


There is, however, far too much singing (yes, really) and the film grinds to a halt every time this happens.


So, it’s two films in one. If this perhaps made more of a ‘political statement’ (which, of course, it doesn’t need to do) or at least felt a little more dystopian, it could soar.


If the premise wasn’t there at all, or at least toned down, it’d probably work as a mindless watch.


If it really is sent from a future, fascist state then we should all be worried.


For a romantic comedy, it is both unnecessarily bizarre, potentially harmful propaganda and also harmless fluff. I guess you decide whether you want to swipe left or right on that.


⭐️⭐️⭐️

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Social Reckoning

I guess there’s a degree of irony in posting a positive review of The Social Reckoning onto social media and praising its pointed messaging. The ‘investigative journalism thriller’ is always a winner

 
 
 
Digger

Alejandro González Iñárritu is certainly not afraid of a big swing. Whilst it’s fair to say that Digger doesn’t get close to the heights of Birdman or The Revenant, its critical panning feels unusual,

 
 
 
Hope (2026)

You won’t have seen a film with as many contrasts as Na Hong-jin’s Hope. At once impeccably crafted and beautiful, but also batshit crazy and prone to toilet humour interludes. At times you can feel w

 
 
 

Comments


 

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

 

© Copyright 2015 by Daniel Oldfield. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page