top of page

Alice Through the Looking Glass

  • Jun 2, 2016
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jul 25

Alice Through The Looking Glass might just be Tim Burton's craziest film yet and that's quite a claim.


Producing, not directing, this follow-on from the surprisingly massively successful, but not universally loved, first adaptation this continues Alice's adventures in Wonderland (Underland? I'm confused.)


This is like a little vignette compared to the first and, actually, works very well as a completely standalone film with a succinct and wrapped-up story.


Burton's trademark eccentricity and imagination are to the fore and, once again, dazzling here with special mention going to his personification of Time and his castle which forms a giant clock (the hanging pocket watches signifying life and death are genius.)


Sacha Baron Cohen (playing Time) is the major addition to the cast and, besides Alice, is the most integral aspect to this story.


This is a blessing as Cohen is classically hilarious (fun fact: James Bobin, the Director here, assisted Cohen in the creation of Ali G and Borat.)


Alice is tasked with travelling back to save the family of the Hatter to rescue him from apparent death, with Time pursuing her across this journey (across the, literal, ocean of time which is a nice touch) to stop the end of the world.


Johnny Depp returns as the mad one and is as animated and outré as ever but the reduced screen-time he gets here is actually a blessing. I'm surely not the only one to find his portrayal a tad annoying?


The supporting cast get their parts to play as well and, once again, the shining light is Helena Bonham Carter's Red Queen and her anatomically unfortunate head.


Here, we get the origins of that story and more opportunity for Bonham Carter to act bratty and villainous (which she does better than anyone else.)


Sometimes Burton's ideas get a little too OTT (the vegetable guards who patrol the Red Queen's new castle are just silly and unnecessary) but the good outweighs the bad here.


I'm still not convinced by the real-life story framing the adventure though. Although it successfully follows Disney's new protocol of promoting strong female role models to a young audience (which Mia Wasikowska is ideally cast for) it is lacking in detail.


I also believe that, although the plot is solid, it's almost too-nicely wrapped up and doesn't do enough as a sequel to drive the franchise forward.


It smacks of Disney, surprised by the success of the first, rushing to get a sequel released.


Having said that, this is a brilliantly watchable, thrilling family adventure with Disney production values.


It's not as good as the 1951 original but is a decent watch.


⭐️⭐️⭐️

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Dog Stars

Sometimes you have to try and separate a film from the time in which its released. For whatever reason, we often see spurts of films within the same genre get released at the same time. From A Bug’s L

 
 
 
One Night Only

Original doesn’t always mean good and, to further go against most every review I’ve ever written, not all ‘Black Mirror-esque’ ideas necessarily make for great films. One Night Only is, however, an in

 
 
 
The End of Oak Street

The End of Oak Street is J.J. Abrams' next stab at Steven Spielberg homage after Super 8. Producing rather than directing this time around this film almost tries to present itself as the true, origina

 
 
 

Comments


 

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

 

© Copyright 2015 by Daniel Oldfield. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page